Seriel Killer wrote:You are forgetting the other side, where you have a good working zone where everybody is happy and enjoy the management of the person in charge. Too bad we never got to see that here.
No, you are being ridiculous. I'm not saying things could not be better but come on...
1. We used to have what you call "a good working zone" till like league 9.
2. No one is happy with everything
3. The person in charge is always blamed for everything even it's a voluntary game where everyone should do their own share.
4. Ent was chosen to lead this zone because the majority, by far, wanted him! If you don't like him anymore, fair enough but
remember the guy was suggested to take over Hoch like billion times. He was also given an impossible task; revive a 16-year-old
game (zone) that had already surpassed the point of slow death. The only chance that could have ever worked out was if at
least 30 of the remaining players put in the same effort he did.
I'm getting sick of everyone always blaming the guy in charge. In some cases, loops, chy, Hoch, liito (Ent) made some bad calls but
not half of the poor things happened to the zone are the fault of the leader. I could not have asked for anyone better than Ent to
take over because at least he believe(d/s) in the zone's future more than anyone else. People like me, who said the revival of the
zone is an impossible task, should be ashamed, not Ent.